# Understanding the Uncertainty Principle: A Wave Perspective

Written on

The Uncertainty Principle often serves as an introduction to quantum mechanics for many students. The notion that we cannot definitively know both the position and momentum of an object seems strange, especially for those familiar only with Newtonian physics. While this principle is frequently characterized as a quirk of quantum mechanics, I believe it is time to reframe our understanding: the Uncertainty Principle is not inherently quantum.

To clarify, the Uncertainty Principle indicates a fundamental connection between our knowledge of a particle's position and momentum. Specifically, increased precision in determining a particle's location results in decreased knowledge of its momentum, and vice versa. This contrasts sharply with our everyday experiences, where knowing the precise location and speed of a car is crucial for safely crossing the street.

Thus, the Uncertainty Principle appears counterintuitive. However, while the quantum realm is filled with enigmas, the principle itself is not one of them. To illustrate, consider a sound wave.

Sound travels through the air as a wave characterized by frequency—the number of wave peaks passing a point over time. Waves can also combine in a phenomenon known as superposition.

Imagine two sound signals: signal A, a pure wave with a single frequency, and signal B, a complex signal created by combining multiple waves of varying frequencies and amplitudes. Signal A exhibits a significant amplitude for most of its duration, while signal B only reaches a high amplitude for brief intervals. Below are the representations of signals A and B:

Now, if we analyze the frequency spectrum of these signals—essentially the collection of amplitudes of the component waves—we find that signal A has a narrow spectrum, as it requires only one frequency. In contrast, signal B has a broad spectrum, formed by a wide range of frequencies. The frequency spectra are shown below:

When asked for the frequency of the two signals, you would easily identify signal A's frequency. However, for signal B, determining a single frequency is challenging due to its composite nature, resulting in uncertainty.

Conversely, if I were to ask about the duration of each signal, you could provide a clear answer for signal B, as it has defined start and end points. In contrast, signal A lacks distinct boundaries, making its duration uncertain.

This leads us to an uncertainty relationship: knowing the duration of a sound signal with certainty results in an uncertain frequency, and the reverse holds true.

How does this concept connect to quantum mechanics? A key idea in quantum mechanics is that particles, such as protons and electrons, can exhibit wave-like behavior, often described by wavefunctions.

A particle's position wavefunction indicates that the higher the amplitude at a specific location, the more likely it is to be found there upon measurement. Similarly, a momentum wavefunction reveals the likelihood of measuring the particle with a certain momentum.

Just as a sound signal is a superposition of various sound waves, a position wavefunction is a superposition of momentum eigenstates, which are wavefunctions with a specific momentum, akin to the individual sound waves forming signal B.

Consider two quantum particles, A and B. If particle A is confined to a narrow spatial region, its position wavefunction is also narrow. Particle B, being localized over a broader area, has a wider position wavefunction. The graphs below illustrate the position wavefunctions of both particles:

Just as a short-duration sound signal comprises many frequencies, particle A's narrow wavefunction is a superposition of various momentum eigenstates, resulting in a wide range of possible momenta.

In contrast, particle B's wider position wavefunction requires fewer momentum eigenstates, leading to a more limited range of momentum options. The momentum wavefunctions of particles A and B are depicted below:

If a particle's position is completely undefined—meaning it could be found anywhere—its wavefunction aligns with a momentum eigenstate, resulting in a uniquely defined momentum.

This encapsulates the uncertainty principle: greater certainty about a particle's spatial location leads to a broader range of possible momenta, while less certainty about its position results in a narrower range of potential momenta.

Importantly, this uncertainty is not a reflection of our measurement capabilities. Regardless of the measurement technique employed, a fundamental uncertainty exists between a particle's position and momentum.

This intrinsic uncertainty arises from the mathematics governing wave behavior. Fourier’s Theorem states that any continuous function can be expressed as a sum of sine and cosine waves of specific frequencies and amplitudes, known as a Fourier Series. If we represent the amplitude of these component waves using a mathematical function, the sum transforms into an integral, resulting in a Fourier Transform.

Variables linked by a Fourier transform will exhibit an uncertainty relationship. These pairs are termed conjugate pairs, with time and frequency being conjugate pairs in sound waves, and position and momentum as conjugate pairs in quantum matter waves.

Therefore, I contend that the Uncertainty Principle is a wave phenomenon rather than a purely quantum effect. Its presence in classical systems, like sound waves, indicates that the wave-like nature of quantum particles does not uniquely generate uncertainty principles. While quantum mechanics has its peculiarities—including the wave-like behavior of particles—the imposition of uncertainty principles is not one of them.

Often, the Uncertainty Principle is employed to showcase the strangeness of quantum mechanics to the public as a means of emphasizing the "coolness" of physics. While there are countless aspects of the universe that remain enigmatic, the Uncertainty Principle is not one of them. I believe it would be more beneficial for outreach efforts to highlight the mathematical and physical foundations underlying this seemingly strange effect, rather than relying on confusion to spark interest in the realm of physics.

In addition, here is another insightful video from 3Blue1Brown: